YOU SAID IT: What then, Canada?

Content of the article

What then, Canada?

According to the parliamentary budget employee, our leaders took the country to the ground. This is very serious.

Content of the article

Recommended video

Content of the article

Content of the article

What will have the future for our treasured basic social programs (which any boomer can testify, already worsening), and how will our children function in a destroyed economy? How will the elderly survive with the cost of a balloon? What will happen to our so-called “free” healthcare system (which all politicians, gum dishes recognize, is a mess, but not a single thing is done with this)?

We have a wealth of energy that can help, but from the ideology we are not allowed to use the resources that we have in our hands.

How does people worry about a bunch of birds in the West, but not about that?

We are already one of the most taxable countries in the world. What will they do to continue underwriting their extravagant ambitions … Find new methods of taxation of us? Bring more people, worsening our crises of housing and health?

Content of the article

Things are already inaccessible, as is. Oh, of course, they claim that they have a plan for our economy. But they will sacrifice to every existing Canadian to get there if they get at all. Then why was it all? It is difficult to have confidence in the government without transparency and a bad track record on ethics.

We are really in a very heavy strait!

Burton Blays
Addison, Ontario.

PBO does not strike

The prestige to our new temporary officer in the parliamentary budget Jason Jacques, because he did not inflict any blows, because he does not claim that the way of expenses we are on is unstable.

This guy seems to really understand the consequences of the habits of our government and the anxiety sounds. I am sure that the carny brandy did not like his tone when Jacques directly pointed a finger at him about how to change this in the future.

Content of the article

Since Stephen Harper, we had a balanced budget, and the linear position on the current balance sheet, which states that “interest on debts” is overwhelmed.

Wayne Boyce
Carleton Plays

Celebrity disease

Sarah Maklahlan seems to mean that she should be ashamed or is some kind of victim for the fact that she is a “white woman of privileges”. Please. I am tired of these so-called Canadian celebrities (Mike Mayers is one).

Her great concern is now – freedom of speech by Jimmy Kimmel. Was she there to protect the cancellation of Don Cherry for no reason? I wonder if she is generally concerned about the plans of the liberals to mitigate the freedom of Canadians? I doubt it very much.

Lavender Giselle
Orleans

Drive what you say

Your letters are welcome at: [email protected]Turn on your name and surname and city/city. Keep your letters short – and please Try to be civilianEven with criticism or disagree. We edit accuracy, length, clarity and legal problems.

Content of the article