1
2
const title = “Weekly Quiz: Harassment, Hardline, and Playlist Politics”; const date = “November 29, 2025”; constant data = [
{
image: “https://walrus-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/img/Ladly_AlligatorAlcatraz_1800.jpg”,
title: “The Overlooked Canadian Role in Trump’s Migrant Crackdown”,
url: “https://thewalrus.ca/the-overlooked-canadian-role-in-trumps-migrant-crackdown/”,
question: “Government investment in private security firms often raises eyebrows, and Quebec’s stake in GardaWorld—now fulfilling contracts with Alligator Alcatraz—is no exception. How much did the province invest in GardaWorld in 2022?”,
options: [
“$105 million”,
“$250 million”,
“$300 million”,
“$500 million”,
]answer: “$300 million”, correct: “In 2022, the Government of Quebec invested $300 million in GardaWorld through Investissement Québec, purchasing preferred shares on market terms. “Anyone who owns a $300 million stake in any company, [this size] has significant influence over the activities of this company,” says Toronto lawyer James Yap. The office of Christine Frechette, Quebec's Minister of Economy, Innovation and Energy, did not respond to requests for an interview. Andrés Fontesilla of Québec Solidaire, a member of the Quebec National Assembly for Laurier-Dorion, criticized the provincial government's approach to the issue. “We condemn the fact that public money is being used to finance, even indirectly, concentration camps for migrants whose only crime is that they illegal immigrants,” Fontesilla wrote in an emailed statement. “wrong: “In 2022, the Government of Quebec invested $300 million in GardaWorld through Investissement Québec, purchasing preferred shares at market terms. “Anyone who owns a $300 million piece of any company, [this size] has significant influence over the activities of this company,” says Toronto lawyer James Yap. The office of Christine Frechette, Quebec's Minister of Economy, Innovation and Energy, did not respond to requests for an interview. Andrés Fontesilla of Québec Solidaire, a member of the Quebec National Assembly for Laurier-Dorion, criticized the provincial government's approach to the issue. “We condemn the fact that public money is being used to finance, even indirectly, concentration camps for migrants whose only crime is that they illegal immigrants,” Fontesilla wrote in an emailed statement. “, }, { title: “Why don't we take stalking more seriously?”, url: “https://thewalrus.ca/why-dont-we-take-stalking-more-serious/”, question: “After surviving a brutal attack by her ex-partner and stalker, Colette Martin played a critical role in lobbying in New Brunswick, helping to pass Bill 17 into law. What information does Bill 17 allow people to access from the police if they believe they are at risk of intimate partner violence (IPV)?”, options: [
“Whether their partner has undergone previous psychological evaluation”,
“Whether their partner has a history of IPV”,
“Their partner’s full criminal record, including non-IPV offenses”,
“The duration of any previous peace bond or restraining order against their partner”,
]answer: “Regardless of whether their partner has a history of IPV,” correct: “Bill 17 or the Intimate Partner Violence Protection Disclosure Act gives police the legal right to tell individuals whether a current or former partner has a history of IPV if they have reason to believe that person is at risk.” Alternatively, if someone feels they are at risk of IPV, they can contact the authorities and request this information. If Martin had known that her ex-boyfriend had previously been charged with breaking his girlfriend's ex-jaw, she would have been more aware of his violent tendencies and might not have dated him at all.”, incorrect: “Bill 17, or the Intimate Partner Violence Protection Disclosure Act, gives police the legal authority to tell people whether a current or former partner has a history of IPV if they have reason to believe that person is at risk of IPV.” they could contact authorities and request this information if Martin knew her ex-boyfriend was at risk. previously accused of breaking an ex-girlfriend's jaw, she would have been more aware of his violent tendencies and might not have dated him at all.”, }, { image: “https://walrus-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/img/Kane_Kakisa_4.jpg”, title: “Wildfires threaten the existence of this tiny northern town, here's how he fights back”, url: “https://thewalrus.ca/tiny-town-wildfires/”, question: “Historical context shapes how people talk about local food systems in the North. Trent Stokes, who runs a community garden in Fort Smith, uses the term food security rather than agriculture. Why does Stokes make this distinction?” [
““Agriculture” often suggests a focus on cash crops rather than subsistence farming”,
““Agriculture” can remind elders of the colonial razing of their land”,
““Food security” emphasizes access to food as a human right”,
““Food security” better reflects the garden’s purpose as means of emergency preparedness”,
]answer: 'Farming' can remind elders of the colonial devastation of their lands', correct: 'Stokes calls himself a 'northern bush boy' but claims his greatest passion is growing food, which he says has helped him overcome his battle with addiction. What he says started as a plan to grow marijuana turned into a love of growing flowers and then vegetables. Stokes' recovery through food growing is an unusual story in northern communities. The garden he manages is wedged between the former mission and the boarding school. He prefers the term “food security” rather than “agriculture” because the latter can remind elders of the colonial destruction of their lands.”, incorrect: “Stokes calls himself a “northern bush boy” but claims his greatest passion is growing food, which he says has helped him overcome his battle with addiction. What he said started as a plan to grow marijuana turned into a love of growing flowers and then Stokes' recovery through growing food is an unusual story in northern communities. The garden he manages is sandwiched between a former mission and a boarding school. He prefers the term “food security” rather than “agriculture” because the latter can remind elders of the colonial destruction of their lands.”, }, { title: “Amid Buy Canadian, Should We Listen to the Canadians Too?”, url: “https://thewalrus.ca/amid-buy-canadian-should-we-listen-canadian-too/”, question: “The US border poses a major financial barrier for Canadian artists. Go here includes not only a higher visa cost, but also a higher tax rate on non-resident artists than the Canadian government requires. What percentage of gross income does the US require from non-resident artists?”, options: [
“5 percent”,
“15 percent”,
“30 percent”,
“45 percent”,
]answer: “30 percent”, correct: “Artists often look at North America as one big audience, but the border has been important to music for decades. With a population more than eight times that of Canada, the US represents a huge opportunity for artists: that is, if they can afford to tour. states.”, incorrect: “Artists often look at North America as one big audience, but the border has been important to music for decades. With the US population being eight times that of Canada, the US represents a huge opportunity for artists: that is, if they can afford to tour, the US tax regime requires 30 per cent of gross income for non-resident artists (the Canada Revenue Agency only requires 15 per cent – and this amount can be reduced through expense claims).”, }, ];
Fast Weekly Quiz: Harassment, Hardline and Playlist Politics first appeared on Walrus.
