One of X's best writers/commentators is the aptly named author @DataRepublicanwho does a great job of digging into the data, crunching the numbers, collecting large nests of snakes and laying them out in a straight line, and discovering things that typically make leftists uncomfortable.
DataRepublican has outdid myself on this topic. Let's look at a few highlights. First an introductory post:
🧵🚨 MAIN BREAK: International players are involved in a color revolution led by the State Department 🚨🚨
This is not speculation; this is straight from a recorded conversation.
Former USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups out of government systems and into… pic.twitter.com/XtinGt306o
— DataRepublican (small R) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
DataRepublican writes in full:
Former USAID employees describe how they moved internal groups from government systems to encrypted Signal chats before Jan. 20, and quickly reached out to foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at a color revolution is not new news; this piece was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.
But what is not reported is the international aspect. One participant openly calls it a “global anti-authoritarian movement,” linking U.S. officials with “colleagues around the world who have been directly involved in this.”
They cite coordination with Johns Hopkins, “international democracy and spaces for conflict mitigation,” and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.
At what point does it become a betrayal?
As always, please be patient as I put this topic together.
I encourage you to read the entire thread and listen to the video clips. There are some very embarrassing things here; Judging by the videos presented, people are trying to (at least) hide their international contacts and conversations from the legally established authority, namely, from President Trump.
Look at this:
Ro Tucci herself talks about attracting international actors to help in the color revolution. Their role will be to “mobilize around corruption”… what does that mean? pic.twitter.com/IyciS8BhJH
— DataRepublican (small R) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
During the conversation, the speaker, in particular, said:
We don't have to be middlemen either. We can bring in actors or colleagues from around the world who have directly dealt with these very specific issues (inaudible). Whether it's fighting corruption or ways of responding to corruption, mobilizing around corruption, we can engage these people and become kind of mediators. So, again, I think these coordinations and structures are just starting to take place.
Okay, I'm not a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist, but the presence of a group of disgruntled former USAID employees talking in a Signal chat about “anti-corruption” is more than baffling, it's downright disturbing. This appears to be Trump's derangement syndrome mobilizing for battle.
Read more: Dangerous rhetoric: Pelosi called Trump a 'vile creature' during 'Off the Rails' interview
Obama's latest shadow government ploy: Internet censorship exposed. He must be held accountable.
But here's the part where your eyebrows should be sledding on the top of the skull:
Lest you think this is harmless, they explicitly admit that their goal is to create new “socio-political systems of economic governance.”
If this isn't a coup, I don't know what is. pic.twitter.com/45HWwzxfef
— DataRepublican (small R) (@DataRepublican) November 9, 2025
This speaker says:
Fueling the current constitutional crisis is our opportunity to catalyze and create synergy for dynamic change. A dynamic change that makes fractal ecosystems capable of jointly generating the emergence of new (uniting them? It’s not clear) based systems of socio-political and economic governance. This is a long sentence.
It's a long sentence because of all the bureaucratic jargon spread thicker than butter on the country biscuits. But if you strip all that away, what you're left with looks a lot like a group of people planning to at least make some major changes to “socio-political-economic management.”
And what constitutional crisis? I don't know about any constitutional crisis. President Trump was elected and took office in accordance with the Constitution. The officers of his administration and other appointees were appointed and confirmed in accordance with the Constitution. Every time a judge, no matter how obviously biased, ruled that the Trump administration should stop taking certain actions, they paused, awaiting further legal action.
There. Is. No. Constitutional. Crisis.
But they will be if such people continue this behind-the-scenes competition.
I encourage you: Read the whole thread. Watch the video. We all need to understand exactly what is happening here.
Editor's note: The Schumer shutdown is here. Instead of putting the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the Radical Democrats forced the government to shut down health care to illegal immigrants. They own it.
Help us continue to report the truth about Schumer's closure. Use promo code POTUS47 and get 74% off your VIP membership.
