Trump suggests some federal workers won’t get paid after shutdown : NPR

President Trump is floating in that some of the approximately 600,000 thoroughly federal workers could be refused a return board after again departure, despite the 2019 law, intended to ensure compensation for federal employees after closing.

Speaking in an oval office on Tuesday, Trump, it seems, publicly returned the White House draft, which includes an argument for refusing to pay employees.

“I would say that it depends on what we are talking about,” Trump said. “I can tell you this: the democrats put a lot of people in great risk and danger, but it really depends on what you are talking about. But for the most part we will take care of our people. There are some people who really do not deserve to take care of us, and we will take care of them in the other way. ”

They pressed the legality of such a step, Trump said: “What the law says is correct, and I follow the law.”

Trump answered questions about the project a note from the Office of the Office and the Budget, which was first informed of the AKS and confirmed by a senior White House official, not authorized to discuss the memorandum that was not publicly widespread.

The struggle for federal payment of employees is the last salvo in the efforts of the Trump administration to force the Democrats to vote for a pure permanent resolution and abandon their requirements for the provision of healthcare subsidies for millions of Americans.

The legal argument of the memorandum is contrary to Personnel management And The wording of the 2019 Law Signed by Trump during its first period, which clearly guarantees that federal workers are “paid” when the shutdown ends, regardless of whether they were condensed or continued to work.

The Law on Fair Processing of State Workers of 2019, the Binoparty Law adopted after a record 35-day shutdown in 2018, added a language to the Antidgets Law, which automatically applies a return payment to federal employees for “any gap in allocations that begin on December 22, 2018.

Earlier, the congress was supposed to approve retroactive financing after closing with new legislation.

The White House memoranda marks a item in the text that states that employees should be paid “at the earliest date after the lost in the allocations ends, regardless of the planned payment dates, and subject to the accepting allocation ending with the intervals,” and claims that this means that the action of the congress is necessary for return.

The management published by the Office of Management and the Budget on September 30 included a link to automatically restore the wages of the law.

“The law on fair processing of state workers in 2019 (Public Law 116-1) stipulates that after the assignment will be taken into account, the interval will complete September 30. The heap readsThe field “Additional guide for the implementation of public law 116-1 and the processing of payment and vacation is available to OPM.”

A The version updated on October 3 Removes these paragraphs.

The project of the memorandum is the last in a multi -painted campaign under pressure from the White House, striving to punish the democrats during a stop, including efforts to cancel grant financing for energy projects and withholding transport financing in states that did not vote for Trump in 2024. The administration also threatened with widespread reduction efforts in federal agencies that have not yet been materialized.

Congress answers

The speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson, R-la., Told reporters that, although he was not very familiar with the plan and did not discuss him with the White House, it is possible that there may be a legal substantiation for the project.

“There are legal analysts who think that this is not what the government should do,” Johnson said. “If this is true, this should lead to urgency and necessity when the Democrats do the right things here.”

The leading democrat in the Assigating Committee in the Senate, Senator Patti Murray, D-Wash., Claimed that any interpretation to resist the payment was “lawless”.

“They are plotting to try to rob the condensed federal retail employees at the end of this shutdown,” Murray said in comments on the floor in the Senate. “This contradicts the simple text of the law, which cannot be more clear.”

Dipa shivara contributed to this report.