Trump administration also The court called To take on the case and refute the decision of the ninth circle, which it described as “canceled” BridgeThe field “Since most real estate owners do not publish signs, or they allow, or prohibit weapons, the Khaawaii rule is functioning as an almost complete ban on public transfer,” they said. “A person who carries a pistol for self -defense commits a crime when entering a shopping center, refueling, a shop, a supermarket, a restaurant, a cafe or even a parking lot.”
The state of Hawaii energetically defended the decision of the lower court and the rule of property by default as a whole. The revised law, claimed, “represents permissible efforts to confirm the rights of citizens of Hawaii to exclude armed persons from their private property.” The default real estate rules are not unknown to the law, he noted, pointing to the decision of the 1951 Supreme Court in favor of the municipal law, which prohibited the “door to the door to the door”, if the owner did not give obvious consent, even if such a law may, apparently, violate the first amendment.
Hawaii too Sharp This is when it comes to tests for history and traditions, the state has a unique tradition as a former sovereign country. The plaintiffs argued that in American history there was a historical tradition of implied resolution. “This may be true in other states, but in Hawaii an open transfer was never default,” the state told the court. “Hawaii restrict the weapons in public places with at least 1852 – end before the US Constitution was widespread in Hawaii.” (The islands were annexed by the United States in 1898.)
