INAll cancer experts The ban of the sunny suns in the UK Will not listen immediately. So far, not a single minister or opposition party has given an idea of supporting a step that many consider excessively restrictive. Also, the public was not consulted. While the World Cancer Research Fund (British charity organization) supports the ban, Rack Research UK adhered to warnings.
Nose Skin cancer increasesAnd the evidence that the existing ban on children using solar legs is violated, it is not surprising that doctors who doctors believe should do more. The ban on children using commercial solar legs in the UK was introduced in 2010. Since then, Australia has generally banned such a business. Professor Paul Lorigan and other authors article The British Medical Journal states that such a law as Australia will be the most economically effective way to reduce cases of melanoma, even if it included compensation for enterprises. The data indicate that young women in the deprived parts of North England are at a special risk.
As in the case of other types of activities and products, which, as you know, cause cancer or other diseases, an alternative is a more stringent regulation and state education aimed at convincing people to make a healthier choice. On tobacco, Great Britain chose a ban – albeit gradual, with a bill prohibited by the sale of tobacco products to everyone who was born after January 1, 2009. The new law will also prohibit the sale of VAPES for children, and also limits advertising even more and even more Smoking in public placesThe field on the contrary, on unhealthy food and alcohol work failed to fulfill promises for preliminary electionsWith more rigid rules for the delay in advertising, and England still does not follow Scotland with a minimum price per unit for alcohol.
Public health participants are too aware of such inconsistencies. When it comes to a powerful industry of food products and drinks, commitment to consistent governments to prevent diseases is tension due to a widespread approach.
The question of what kind of risky actions should be prohibited will always be difficult in a liberal society. People always risk their health and safety and value the opportunity to make their own choice and mistakes. But, as indicated by health officials in connection with High risk cosmetic surgeryThe British National Health System in the UK makes the potential shortcomings of such decisions more difficult to dismiss. The choice is not just at the “own risk” of a person, when negative consequences and costs are used.
With the “taxes on sin”, as they are known, there is another type of expenses and benefits. Although the pleasure received from alcohol and the profit made from its sale are two reasons why there is little appetite to restrictions, the other is that the treasury earns around £ 12.5 billion in responsibility From sales every year.
As in the case of SunBeds, public health experts note that more poor people undergo the greatest risk of obesity and alcohol of harm (although one recent survey showed that the richest families are more likely to have The problem of dependence) Attempts to change consumer behavior should never be replaced by the fight against Socio -economic determinants of poor healthincluding inadequate income and housing. But also there can be no danger to health from gambling, ultra -processed food, sunbaters and other risky products and services are simply ignored. If the ministers want the public to trust them, the prevention in healthcare should be more than a fashionable word.
-
Do you have an opinion on issues raised in this article? If you want to file an answer up to 300 words by e -mail, which will be considered for publication in our letters Section, please Click hereField
