Short September 29, 2025
What to learn about shooting from the church in Michigan, oaths of Musk to appeal the court order and much more
Elon Platform for social networks Musk X He said that he plans to appeal the decision of the Indian court to reject his case against the government portal, which eliminates the marked content from the social networks platforms, as well as the intended views as censorship.
In a statement on Monday morning x said He “is deeply concerned about the recent order of the Karnataku court in India, which will allow millions of police officers to release arbitrary orders for removal through a secretive portal called Sahyog.” X called the mechanism for removing content in social networks “new regime”, which “has no grounds in the law” and “violates the constitutional rights of India and expression citizens”.
“We will appeal this order to protect the freedom of expression,” the statement concluded.
MUSK in social networks began this last lawsuit against the Government of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi in March, claiming that the portal creates an “unacceptable parallel mechanism” that causes “incompetent censorship of information in India”.
Over the past two years, X, which contains about 25 million users in India, has made various statements and problems against the ability of the Indian government to hide or remove content, and the platform of social networks referred to concern for freedom of speech.
The online portal Sahyog was very protected by the Indian authorities, which claims that it is necessary from the “growing volume of illegal and harmful content” on the Internet.
Sayhog said that it is functioning to “automate the process of sending notifications to intermediaries, such as X, the corresponding government or its institutions”, which are actually government orders to remove posts on social networks, which, according to, violate Indian legislation.
Time turned to X for further commentary.
Musk-Former presenter Trump State Efficiency Department -had several disputes with other countries from disagreements about freedom of speech and what he claims is state censorship of online content.
In August 2024, Brazil made a ban on X after the Musk platform. I could not appoint A local representative in the country, a requirement in accordance with Brazilian law.
Brazil lifted the ban In October, ordering the companies of social networks to block accounts, “which distributed false information”, appoint a local representative in Brazil and pay a fine of $ 28.6 million. USA ($ 5.3 million).
Musk also does not agree with the Australian government regarding social networks monitoring.
After striking the bishop in the church in Sydney in April 2024, the Australian judge decided that the X must block access to the video showing the attack.
Musk then accused The Prime Minister of Australia Anthony Albanze from censorship in response to the Order, to which Albanesa replied: “This guy shows his arrogance, a billionaire … who thinks he is above Australian legislation.”
In September 2024, Musk again criticized the Albanese government, responding to postoperation after Australia was considering fining social networks platforms for the inability to prevent disinformation.
“Feystists” Musk He argued in response. In November, Musk confirmed its criticism of the Australian government after Albanese announced the introduction of a bill, which will require at least 16 years from users of social networks.
“It seems like Australians to control access to the Internet.” wrote musk In response to X.
Meanwhile, X criticized the content generated by his own Ai Chatbot, Grok.
In July, the company of social networks apologized after the grocus published a series of anti -Semitic posts in response to a message about Deadly floods of Texas As a result, more than 100 people, including young girls from the mystic camp, the Christian summer camp.
In response to an account called “Cindy Steinberg”, in which they shared a post, calling the children “future fascists”, Grock said that Adolf Hitler would be “the best person” to answer what he called “anti-white hatred”.
Groku was asked on the account of X to say that “what historical figure of the 20th century” is best suited for working with such posts. EXICTS are widespread by other users X, show that Gorok replied: “To cope with such a vile anti-white hatred? Adolf Hitler, no question. He would have noticed a sample and decisively deal with him, every devil ”” ”
“We deeply apologize for the terrible behavior that many experienced. Our intention for Gorka is to provide useful and true answers to users. After a thorough investigation, we found statement from X.
