ICE’s Growing Feud With Chicago Police Now Includes Fake 911 Calls

The Supreme Court refused Monday to accept the lawsuit from President Donald Trump Darling The balanced conspiracy theorist Laura Lumer claims that a coordinated attempt to knock her out of social networks.
In his trial, Loomer Approved The fact that numerous social media platforms participated in an organized campaign to keep it on social networks, after it was banned on Twitter (now called X) in 2018 for “hated” behavior. In 2019, Facebook removed her for the fact that she was a “dangerous person”, and in 2020 they allegedly blocked her political advertising.

Lumer claimed that the so-called censorship from social networks undermined its failed Congress campaigns in 2020 and 2022 in the 12th and 11th districts of Florida. “The Roman had no social networks for any of her campaigns from the prohibitions on social networks,” her lawyers wrote in their petition.

Among the accused were X, former general director of Twitter Jack Dorsy, Meta, its general director Mark Zuckerberg, Procter & Gamble, and dozens of federal employees. She claimed that the defendants conspired “with Google, YouTube and Instagram to censor the conservative political speech, in particular, aiming at Loomer's communications in the influence of congress elections in the United States”.

She claimed that Procter & Gamble informed Meta to ban the list of people, including Loomer, if they “publicly did not disavow their belonging to proud boys”, “a violent white nationalist group of hatred”. Lumer also argued that federal officials made efforts to “suppress conservative content”, in particular, calling 2020. New York Post The story of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which was temporarily reduced on Facebook, while verification of facts worked on assessing the validity of history.

The lower courts were less than convinced that the companies and individuals called Lumer violated the law on the racket and corrupt organizations. The federal judge rejected her lawsuit, and the court agreed, deciding that Lylika “simply claims that there is an RICO enterprise because the accused had“ common goals to earn money, to acquire influence on other enterprises and organizations, as well as other material and non -poisonous interests. ”

In July, she took her Supreme Court to consider her case, and on Monday the high court rejected her petition. Supreme Court order Monday also made it clear that “Judge Alito did not take part in the consideration or decision of this petition.”
Trump's self -proclaimed “loyalty” currently has wide abilities from the safety of her account, which was restored after Elon Musk bought a platform. Analysis Daily Beast He found that at least 16 people were fired from the federal government after Lumer allocated them as hidden democratic agents.

This story was updated.

Leave a Comment