How Apple’s new 40-60W charger stacks up against the competition

Near the new one iPhone and other Apple products, opened at the autumn event, was also New apple charging brickWhich is impressive, given how much energy it can withdraw. However, due to this size, I was a little skeptical about the fact that he could offer significant advantages compared to existing 60-vat chargers.

So, over the past few days, I checked this, and this is what I found.

From the above data, you can see that Series iPhone 17 Received a good acceleration of charging, which puts it on 16 episodes last yearI also note the field that the iPhone 11 and the iPhone 14 are much older and are used for more than two years each. Thus, although they could quickly fill out due to the presence of smaller batteries, it is worth considering how much they were used. I thought about cutting it off from the data, but I assume that since most people who could own these phones would also use them for years at the moment, this is actually quite representative for the experience of the average user.

I could not start all the phones Threaten slender charger 65 Watt Ganthe data I collected Sprite The protocol that should provide more smart charging. This means “the standard power range of the adjustable voltage supply.” While the surface level, the new technology provides faster charging, after all my testing, most of the advantages of new chargers come from its portable size and decent efficiency.

Plunging deeper into the SPR AVS protocol, it seems that its main advantage over other modern chargers is its ability to feel heat at both ends of the wire, which allows it to reduce the throughput if the phone or charger begins hotly. It sounds great on paper, but in fact it does not often enter the game with what kind of current Apple products.

Most iPhone only charge by about 20 watts, and only new 16/17 series phones increase by 30-40 watts, and even then this is extremely brief. The iPhone 17 Pro Max was the only iPhone that reached 40 watts, and the charger reached only 40 watts for three seconds, and instead spent most of its peak charger about 35 watts. This is also happening on the UGREEN charger. Honestly, most of the things reach their peak charging level in less than a minute, and then spend the remaining time, becoming slower and slower. The iPad may be an exception to this, since they seem to remain at a fairly level 25 level for a long time before falling by 1-2 watts at the end of their charging.

My MacBook Pro He was the only product that really seemed to have a bunch of pressure on the new Apple charger, and it constantly hesitated to 60 watts for about 20 minutes, and then retreated to 40 watts for 20 minutes. This process was repeated for most of the two -hour and six -minute charging time of the computer. This is really impressive, but since the charger was a thermal thromel long before the computer, I'm not sure how much the benefits of SPR AVS compared to popular protocols. PPS (programmable power source), which can also modulate the level of its power on the fly, so that the factor about how much energy the device pulls and heating the charger.

All these are completed in my results, which show that the 65-watt threat charging device works mainly the same as the new Apple model with SPR AVS. Perhaps this technology will be better used in a dynamic charger of 100-200 W down the line, but for 40-60 watts in this small factor, it is mainly the same as any other 60-watt charger in this size.

This is all to say that this is an excellent unit, but will not surpass competition. One of my favorite parts of the new device is that the marketing around it is clearer than most chargers. While my Ugreen Charger marks himself as a 65-watt brick, he is a warmth of a throttle up to 30-40 watts during use, like Apple One. So, in truth, Apple is becoming clear with what people should expect from the product, and I would like the rest of the charger industry to adopt such agreements on names as it.

When it comes to this, I think that I would recommend that most people get UGREEN. Despite the fact that it is slightly larger, it does not block several sockets, it quickly installs Apple and Android products, plus the real kicker is that it has three ports, which makes it a little more useful.

If you want to buy Threaten charger, usually costs $ 60But with the fact that with the Black Friday and the “season of festive purchases”, I think we will begin to see discounts on this, so I propose to resist this. If you want Apple Charger for its slightly better efficiency and smaller place, It costs $ 55But it will be more difficult to find one on sale.