Lack of trust
Google has an answer to the most problematic elements of your test plan, but everywhere there is a gap, it is easy to see a conspiracy. Why? Well, let's look at the situation in which Google is.
Courts decided that Google acted illegally To maintain a monopoly in the Play Store – she worked against the interests of developers and users for many years to make Google play the only viable Android source and why? The Play Store is an almost obscene mess of the sponsored search results and the proposed applications, most of which are more than the purchase plants in the application that deliver billions of dollars every year to Google.
Google has every reason to protect the status -kVO (he can transfer the case up to the Supreme Court), and now he suddenly decided that the risk of loaded applications should be considered. How it is decided, puts Google in the place of the driver at a time when alternative app stores can finally have a chance to prosperThe field is all very convenient for Google.
Developers throughout the Internet express caution in providing Google their personal information. Google, however, decided that the anonymity was too risky. Now we know a little more about how Google will manage the information that he collects for the developers. While information about the Play Store developer is included in the public, the video confirms that there will be no generally accessible list of Sideload developers. Nevertheless, Google will have information, and this means that this may be required by law enforcement agencies or governments.
The current US administration had sharp words for applications such as ICBLOCK, which it Successfully got out of Apple App StoreThe new centralized control of Google in the distribution of applications will allow similar censorship on Android, and the real personality of those who developed this application will also sit in the Google database ready for subra. A few years ago, developers could trust Google with this data, but now? Goodwill left.
