Fichter, K. M., Setayesh, T. & Malik, P. Strategies for precise gene edits in mammalian cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 32, 536–552 (2023).
Jacinto, F. V., Link, W. & Ferreira, B. I. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing: from basic research to translational medicine. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 24, 3766–3778 (2020).
Jang, H.-K., Song, B., Hwang, G.-H. & Bae, S. Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR–Cas system. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1016–1027 (2020).
Li, L., Hu, S. & Chen, X. Non-viral delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing: challenges and opportunities. Biomaterials 171, 207–218 (2018).
Luther, D. C., Lee, Y. W., Nagaraj, H., Scaletti, F. & Rotello, V. M. Delivery approaches for CRISPR/Cas9 therapeutics in vivo: advances and challenges. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 15, 905–913 (2018).
Wang, H.-X. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing for disease modeling and therapy: challenges and opportunities for nonviral delivery. Chem. Rev. 117, 9874–9906 (2017).
Yip, B. H. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery strategies. Biomolecules 10, 839 (2020).
David, R. M. & Doherty, A. T. Viral vectors: the road to reducing genotoxicity. Toxicol. Sci. 155, 315–325 (2017).
Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
Bhattarai-Kline, S. et al. Recording gene expression order in DNA by CRISPR addition of retron barcodes. Nature 608, 217–225 (2022).
Chen, P. J. et al. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes. Cell 184, 5635–5652 (2021).
Doman, J. L. et al. Phage-assisted evolution and protein engineering yield compact, efficient prime editors. Cell 186, 3983–4002 (2023).
Ellington, A. J. & Reisch, C. R. Efficient and iterative retron-mediated in vivo recombineering in Escherichia coli. Synth. Biol. 7, ysac007 (2022).
Farzadfard, F. & Lu, T. K. Genomically encoded analog memory with precise in vivo DNA writing in living cell populations. Science 346, 1256272 (2014).
Fishman, C. B. et al. Continuous multiplexed phage genome editing using recombitrons. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 1299–1310 (2025).
González-Delgado, A., Lopez, S. C., Rojas-Montero, M., Fishman, C. B. & Shipman, S. L. Simultaneous multi-site editing of individual genomes using retron arrays. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1482–1492 (2024).
Hwang, J., Ye, D.-Y., Jung, G. Y. & Jang, S. Mobile genetic element-based gene editing and genome engineering: recent advances and applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 72, 108343 (2024).
Jiang, W., et al. High-efficiency retron-mediated single-stranded DNA production in plants. Synth. Biol. 7, ysac025 (2022).
Kaur, N. & Pati, P. K. Retron library recombineering: next powerful tool for genome editing after CRISPR/Cas. ACS Synth. Biol. 13, 1019–1025 (2024).
Khan, A. G. et al. An experimental census of retrons for DNA production and genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 914–922 (2025).
Kong, X. et al. Precise genome editing without exogenous donor DNA via retron editing system in human cells. Protein Cell 12, 899–902 (2021).
Lee, G. and Kim, J. Engineered retrons generate genome-independent protein-binding DNA for cellular control. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.09.27.556556 (2023).
Lim, H. et al. Multiplex generation, tracking, and functional screening of substitution mutants using a CRISPR/retron system. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 1003–1009 (2020).
Lin, Q. et al. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 582–585 (2020).
Liu, J. et al. Generation of DNAzyme in bacterial cells by a bacterial retron system. ACS Synth. Biol. 13, 300–309 (2024).
Liu, W. et al. Retron-mediated multiplex genome editing and continuous evolution in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 8293–8307 (2023).
Lopez, S. C., Crawford, K. D., Lear, S. K., Bhattarai-Kline, S. & Shipman, S. L. Precise genome editing across kingdoms of life using retron-derived DNA. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 199–206 (2022).
Ramirez-Chamorro, L., Boulanger, P. & Rossier, O. Strategies for bacteriophage T5 mutagenesis: expanding the toolbox for phage genome engineering. Front. Microbiol. 12, 667332 (2021).
Roy, K. R., et al. Dissecting quantitative trait nucleotides by saturation genome editing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.02.577784 (2024).
Schubert, M. G., et al. High-throughput functional variant screens via in vivo production of single-stranded DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018181118 (2021).
Sharon, E. et al. Functional genetic variants revealed by massively parallel precise genome editing. Cell 175, 544–557 (2018).
Simon, A. J., Ellington, A. D. & Finkelstein, I. J. Retrons and their applications in genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 11007–11019 (2019).
Simon, A. J., Morrow, B. R. & Ellington, A. D. Retroelement-based genome editing and evolution. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 2600–2611 (2018).
Tang, S. & Sternberg, S. H. Genome editing with retroelements. Science 382, 370–371 (2023).
Zhao, B., Chen, S.-A. A., Lee, J. & Fraser, H. B. Bacterial retrons enable precise gene editing in human cells. CRISPR J. 5, 31–39 (2022).
Azam, A. H. et al. Evasion of antiviral bacterial immunity by phage tRNAs. Nat. Commun. 15, 9586 (2024).
Bobonis, J. et al. Bacterial retrons encode phage-defending tripartite toxin–antitoxin systems. Nature 609, 144–150 (2022).
Carabias, A. et al. Retron-eco1 assembles NAD+-hydrolyzing filaments that provide immunity against bacteriophages. Mol. Cell 84, 2185–2202 (2024).
Gao, L. et al. Diverse enzymatic activities mediate antiviral immunity in prokaryotes. Science 369, 1077–1084 (2020).
Millman, A. et al. Bacterial retrons function in anti-phage defense. Cell 183, 1551–1561 (2020).
Palka, C., Fishman, C. B., Bhattarai-Kline, S., Myers, S. A. & Shipman, S. L. Retron reverse transcriptase termination and phage defense are dependent on host RNase H1. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 3490–3504 (2022).
Rychlik, I., Sebkova, A., Gregorova, D. & Karpiskova, R. Low-molecular-weight plasmid of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis codes for retron reverse transcriptase and influences phage resistance. J. Bacteriol. 183, 2852–2858 (2001).
Wang, Y. et al. Cryo-EM structures of Escherichia coli Ec86 retron complexes reveal architecture and defence mechanism. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1480–1489 (2022).
Wang, Y., et al. DNA methylation activates retron Ec86 filaments for antiphage defense. Cell Rep. 43, 114857 (2024).
Hsu, M. Y., Eagle, S. G., Inouye, M. & Inouye, S. Cell-free synthesis of the branched RNA-linked msDNA from retron-Ec67 of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13823–13829 (1992).
Shimamoto, T., Inouye, M. & Inouye, S. The formation of the 2′,5′-phosphodiester linkage in the cDNA priming reaction by bacterial reverse transcriptase in a cell-free system. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 581–588 (1995).
Schimmel, J., et al. Modulating mutational outcomes and improving precise gene editing at CRISPR–Cas9-induced breaks by chemical inhibition of end-joining pathways. Cell Rep. 42, 112019 (2023).
Savic, N. et al. Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair. Elife 7, e33761 (2018).
Almeida, A. et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 105–114 (2021).
Pruitt, K. D., Tatusova, T. & Maglott, D. R. NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D61–D65 (2007).
Mestre, M. R., González-Delgado, A., Gutiérrez-Rus, L. I., MartÃnez-Abarca, F. & Toro, N. Systematic prediction of genes functionally associated with bacterial retrons and classification of the encoded tripartite systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 12632–12647 (2020).
Matreyek, K. A., Stephany, J. J., Chiasson, M. A., Hasle, N. & Fowler, D. M. An improved platform for functional assessment of large protein libraries in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e1 (2020).
Hussmann, J. A. et al. Mapping the genetic landscape of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 184, 5653–5669 (2021).
Nambiar, T. S., Baudrier, L., Billon, P. & Ciccia, A. CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair. Mol. Cell 82, 348–388 (2022).
Potapov, V. et al. Base modifications affecting RNA polymerase and reverse transcriptase fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 5753–5763 (2018).
Yasukawa, K. et al. Next-generation sequencing-based analysis of reverse transcriptase fidelity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 492, 147–153 (2017).
Goeckel, M. E. et al. Modulating CRISPR gene drive activity through nucleocytoplasmic localization of Cas9 in S. cerevisiae. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 6, 2 (2019).
Liu, P. et al. Improved prime editors enable pathogenic allele correction and cancer modelling in adult mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 2121 (2021).
Luk, K. et al. Optimization of nuclear localization signal composition improves CRISPR–Cas12a editing rates in human primary cells. GEN Biotechnol. 1, 271–284 (2022).
Maggio, I. et al. Integrating gene delivery and gene-editing technologies by adenoviral vector transfer of optimized CRISPR–Cas9 components. Gene Ther. 27, 209–225 (2020).
Suzuki, K. et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature 540, 144–149 (2016).
Wu, Y. et al. Highly efficient therapeutic gene editing of human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 25, 776–783 (2019).
Inouye, S., Hsu, M.-Y., Xu, A. & Inouye, M. Highly specific recognition of primer RNA structures for 2-OH priming reaction by bacterial reverse transcriptases. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31236–31244 (1999).
Tan, J., Zhang, F., Karcher, D. & Bock, R. Engineering of high-precision base editors for site-specific single nucleotide replacement. Nat. Commun. 10, 439 (2019).
Tanenbaum, M. E., Gilbert, L. A., Qi, L. S., Weissman, J. S. & Vale, R. D. A protein-tagging system for signal amplification in gene expression and fluorescence imaging. Cell 159, 635–646 (2014).
Hinrichsen, M. et al. A new method for post-translationally labeling proteins in live cells for fluorescence imaging and tracking. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 30, 771–780 (2017).
Zhang, L. et al. AsCas12a ultra nuclease facilitates the rapid generation of therapeutic cell medicines. Nat. Commun. 12, 3908 (2021).
Carusillo, A. & Mussolino, C. DNA damage: from threat to treatment. Cells 9, 1665 (2020).
Fok, J. H. L. et al. AZD7648 is a potent and selective DNA-PK inhibitor that enhances radiation, chemotherapy and olaparib activity. Nat. Commun. 10, 5065 (2019).
Fu, Y.-W. et al. Dynamics and competition of CRISPR–Cas9 ribonucleoproteins and AAV donor-mediated NHEJ, MMEJ and HDR editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 969 (2021).
Riesenberg, S., et al. Simultaneous precise editing of multiple genes in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e116 (2019).
Wimberger, S. et al. Simultaneous inhibition of DNA-PK and Polθ improves integration efficiency and precision of genome editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 4761 (2023).
Iwai, K., et al. Molecular mechanism and potential target indication of TAK-931, a novel CDC7-selective inhibitor. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3660 (2019).
Carusillo, A. et al. A novel Cas9 fusion protein promotes targeted genome editing with reduced mutational burden in primary human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 4660–4673 (2023).
Jayavaradhan, R. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 fusion to dominant-negative 53BP1 enhances HDR and inhibits NHEJ specifically at Cas9 target sites. Nat. Commun. 10, 2866 (2019).
Reint, G. et al. Rapid genome editing by CRISPR–Cas9–POLD3 fusion. Elife 10, e75415 (2021).
Gutschner, T., Haemmerle, M., Genovese, G., Draetta, G. F. & Chin, L. Post-translational regulation of Cas9 during G1 enhances homology-directed repair. Cell Rep. 14, 1555–1566 (2016).
Arslan, S., Khafizov, R., Thomas, C. D., Chemla, Y. R. & Ha, T. Engineering of a superhelicase through conformational control. Science 348, 344–347 (2015).
Morrison, C. et al. The essential functions of human RAD51 are independent of ATP hydrolysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6891–6897 (1999).
Barondeau, D. P., Putnam, C. D., Kassmann, C. J., Tainer, J. A. & Getzoff, E. D. Mechanism and energetics of green fluorescent protein chromophore synthesis revealed by trapped intermediate structures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12111–12116 (2003).
Cabantous, S., Terwilliger, T. C. & Waldo, G. S. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 102–107 (2005).
Kamiyama, D. et al. Versatile protein tagging in cells with split fluorescent protein. Nat. Commun. 7, 11046 (2016).
Pinaud, F. & Dahan, M. Targeting and imaging single biomolecules in living cells by complementation-activated light microscopy with split-fluorescent proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E201–E210 (2011).
Feng, J. et al. Generation and characterization of tamoxifen-inducible Pax9-CreER knock-in mice using CRISPR/Cas9. Genesis 54, 490–496 (2016).
Kehler, J. et al. RNA-generated and gene-edited induced pluripotent stem cells for disease modeling and therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 232, 1262–1269 (2017).
Stadelmann, C. et al. mRNA-mediated delivery of gene editing tools to human primary muscle stem cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 28, 47–57 (2022).
Yin, H. et al. Structure-guided chemical modification of guide RNA enables potent non-viral in vivo genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1179–1187 (2017).
Konjikusic, M. J. et al. Mutations in kinesin family member 6 reveal specific role in ependymal cell ciliogenesis and human neurological development. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007817 (2018).
Aird, E. J., Lovendahl, K. N., St. Martin, A., Harris, R. S. & Gordon, W. R. Increasing Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair efficiency through covalent tethering of DNA repair template. Commun. Biol. 1, 1–6 (2018).
Carlson-Stevermer, J. et al. Assembly of CRISPR ribonucleoproteins with biotinylated oligonucleotides via an RNA aptamer for precise gene editing. Nat. Commun. 8, 1711 (2017).
Rees, H. A. & Liu, D. R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 770–788 (2018).
Zhao, Z., Shang, P., Mohanraju, P. & Geijsen, N. Prime editing: advances and therapeutic applications. Trends Biotechnol. 41, 1000–1012 (2023).
Bothmer, A. et al. Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus. Nat. Commun. 8, 13905 (2017).
Engler, C. et al. A golden gate modular cloning toolbox for plants. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 839–843 (2014).
Chen, P. J. & Liu, D. R. Prime editing for precise and highly versatile genome manipulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 161–177 (2023).
Gallagher, D. N. & Haber, J. E. Single-strand template repair: key insights to increase the efficiency of gene editing. Curr. Genet. 67, 747–753 (2021).
Gallagher, D. N., et al. A RAD51-independent pathway promotes single-strand template repair in gene editing. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008689 (2020).
Richardson, C. D. et al. CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the fanconi anemia pathway. Nat. Genet. 50, 1132–1139 (2018).
Okamoto, S., Amaishi, Y., Maki, I., Enoki, T. & Mineno, J. Highly efficient genome editing for single-base substitutions using optimized ssODNs with Cas9-RNPs. Sci. Rep. 9, 4811 (2019).
Schubert, M. S. et al. Optimized design parameters for CRISPR Cas9 and Cas12a homology-directed repair. Sci. Rep. 11, 19482 (2021).
Paulsen, B. S. et al. Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR–Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 878–888 (2017).
Wyatt, D. W. et al. Essential roles for polymerase θ-mediated end joining in the repair of chromosome breaks. Mol. Cell 63, 662–673 (2016).
Richardson, C. D., Ray, G. J., DeWitt, M. A., Curie, G. L. & Corn, J. E. Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR–Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 339–344 (2016).
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).
Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W29–W37 (2011).
Yao, Z., Weinberg, Z. & Ruzzo, W. L. CMfinder—a covariance model based RNA motif finding algorithm. Bioinformatics 22, 445–452 (2006).
Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).
Clement, K. et al. CRISPResso2 provides accurate and rapid genome editing sequence analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 224–226 (2019).
Meeker, N. D., Hutchinson, S. A., Ho, L. & Trede, N. S. Method for isolation of PCR-ready genomic DNA from zebrafish tissues. Biotechniques 43, 610–614 (2007).
