At school or in the office, the mind wanders, is often condemned. Students say “break out of this”, and employees are returning to focus on the task. Nevertheless, a new study shows that with proper support, what looks like a distraction can actually be a powerful tool for solving complex problems.
The joint team of researchers from the USA and the Netherlands found that curious people who allow themselves to dream around labor tasks are more likely to experience strong insights. These outbreaks of understanding can not only cause innovative solutions, but also resume the meaning in their career.
“For many years, I have been fascinated by the phenomenon of insights, but I was not sure how to study them, and I found problems that are faced with a new and unchanging line of research, a little complicated,” said Eric Deine, professor of organizational behavior in the Olin business school at the University of Washington, in the University Press releaseField
Team ConclusionsPublished in Management JournalIt may even encourage jobs for consideration of seminars that perceive the mind, wandering as the path to these moments of light.
Surprising and curious people who dream
The study was attended by business administration students, graduates and novice business leaders in three different research. Participants were evaluated for their ability to have insights related to work, and were carried out through professional seminars and individual training, designed to strengthen leadership skills.
The exercises prompted students to reflect on key life events, the legacy that they hoped to leave, and even their own mortality. It is important to note that the participants were also given time to their minds roam. Dreams were not considered in a focus, but as a deliberate part of the process.
The results were clear: the participants who allowed themselves to dream during the call work were more likely to experience significant information. And those that naturally reach for solving complex problems, as a rule, more curious and motivated to expand their knowledge, have acquired the most. For them, dreaming was less about the escape, and more about finding new ways ahead.
Why is dreaming well to solve problems
“Mind bladering is a particularly useful way to solve problems because it redirects attention from existing solutions and helps people to participate in creative thinking, entertaining completely new opportunities,” said Marcus Baer, professor of organizational behavior at the University of Washington, in the press release.
He added that the dream provides a more playful and liberating approach in comparison with the usual, formal methods for solving problems.
Deine agreed: “When you dream, you are likely to release assumptions – including useless or obsolete beliefs about yourself – and think with flexible and innovative ways. And this opens the door for testing strong insights. ”
Sometimes Deine explained, retreating back to see a wider picture with a small amount of free imagination, can provide not only fresh solutions, but also a stronger sense of goal.
Place for dreams at work
Researchers argue that organizations and business schools should recognize the value of solving problems of solving problems by offering seminars and programs for the development of skills.
Since many people are looking for wider careers in career, this study shows that they can benefit from first look inside. Instead of waiting for external circumstances, to inspire them, deliberate thought and dream can help create breakthroughs that they seek.
“Epiphanies is one of the most memorable and effective psychological events that people experience in their lives, and my research helped me understand when and why people experience insights and how insights form the ways that people focus on their careers, receive self-confidence, collaborate with colleagues and serve leaders in organizations,” Deine said.
Article Sources
Our authors c Discovermagazine.com Use reviewed research and high -quality sources for our articles, and our editors are a review for scientific accuracy and editorial standards. View the sources used below for this article:
