Nintendo also accused Genki of “vast use of Nintendo traders” in connection with their unlicensed products, which is a movement that is “operated[ed] And appropriate[d] For [Genki] Public goodwill associated with … Nintendo Switch Marks “.
The lawsuit also partially concerned conflicting reports that Genki, possibly “unauthorized, illegal early access to Nintendo Switch 2”, as Nintendo put it. Media messages around Ces Genki quoted representatives claim that their 3D-to-beams of the body layout is based on the early access to the real Switch 2 console. But the company later retreated publicly, Writing on social networks This is “we do not own and do not own the console of the black market, as some retail outlets offered.”
In their settlement, Nintendo and Genki simply note that “the Genki represents and indicates that he did not receive any unreasonable property of Nintendo or documents before the official disclosure of the system.”
The document on the publication does not go in detail about the confidential “payment in the agreed amount”, which Genki will make in Nintendo to raise this issue for relaxation. But settlement describes how Genki is forbidden to refer to Nintendo trademarks or even parody names, such as Glitch and Glitch 2 in its future marketing. According to settlement, the packaging for Genki accessories should also “clearly clarify the status of consumers of Genka as an unlicensed manufacturer of accessories”, and not imitate the color scheme of the official equipment of Switch 2.
