What China’s landmark climate pledge means for the fight against global warming

China is currently the dominant force causing and controlling global warming. Over the past decade, China is responsible for 90% of the rise in carbon dioxide emissions that are raising global temperatures. research shows. However, China is also at the forefront of the global green energy transition and filling the leadership vacuum left by the United States after Washington pulled out of international climate agreements.

For this reason, all eyes have been on Beijing's new climate pledge, presented at the UN last month.

On the one hand, this promise marks a step forward. For the first time, China has set an absolute target to reduce emissions rather than limit future growth. In addition, its commitment applies to all greenhouse gas emissions and economic sectors.

Why did we write this

China's new commitment to combating climate change marks a modest step forward for one of the world's most populous countries. It also shows how the bar for climate leadership is falling lower.

However, experts say China's commitments fall far short of the targets needed to meet the Paris Agreement's imperative to limit global temperature rise to less than 1.5 degrees Celsius.

What are China's new goals?

In a video message at the UN climate summit in New York on September 24, Chinese leader Xi Jinping said his country would cut its economy's greenhouse gas emissions by 7% to 10% from peak levels by 2035. Experts say China's greenhouse gas emissions reductions need to be closer to 30% to be on track to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement.

Chinese President Xi Jinping speaks at a climate summit via video conference at the United Nations in New York, September 24, 2025.

“The level of ambition… is quite low” given China's commitments under the Paris Agreement, and “particularly low compared to what they can deliver given the stunning clean energy boom taking place in the country,” says Lauri Myllyvirta, a senior fellow at the China Climate Center at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

Moreover, by tying cuts to an as-yet-undefined “peak” rather than a specific year, Beijing “risks creating an incentive for increased emissions” by communities and firms seeking to lock in fossil fuel capacity at a higher level, Mr. Myllyvirta says.

Leave a Comment